SBI Chairman Criticizes PSMC for Halting Fab Project

In a surprising turn of events, the collaborative venture between Taiwan’s Power Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC) and Japan’s SBI Holdings to establish a semiconductor fabrication plant in Japan has been abruptly terminated. This unexpected conclusion comes after PSMC notified SBI Holdings in late September about its inability to move forward with the ambitious project, which had initially been proposed a year earlier.

Yoshitaka Kitao, the Chairman of SBI Holdings, did not hold back his frustrations, taking to social media to voice concerns about PSMC’s decision. He characterized the dissolution of the partnership as an example of dishonesty and labeled it a “blessing in disguise.” This incident marks a significant moment in SBI’s history, as Kitao pointed out that it was the first time the company had to unilaterally end an alliance after making substantial compromises.

Kitao underscored the gravity of previous negotiations between SBI and governmental officials, citing explicit plans to secure Japanese government subsidies to support the project. He expressed disappointment in PSMC’s failure to honor previously established commitments, suggesting that PSMC’s reluctance to engage with the risks associated with the venture ultimately led to its cancellation. The anticipated semiconductor facility, which was intended to operate from Miyagi Prefecture, aimed to commence production by 2027, thus representing a significant loss for both firms.

This partnership’s dissolution highlights the broader challenges currently facing the semiconductor industry. Reports indicate that PSMC has been grappling with an oversupply of products due to fierce competition from Chinese firms, already showcasing a downturn with operating losses reported for five consecutive quarters since the second quarter of 2023. Such financial pressures have seemingly influenced PSMC’s strategic decisions, resulting in a cautious approach to new investments.

Compounding these difficulties, PSMC was expected to take a consultative approach with its involvement in the fab project, providing technology transfer and training under a Fab IP model without direct investment into the facility. This framework proved insufficient amid concerns raised by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry regarding operational guarantees, which PSMC was unable to satisfy.

The current semiconductor landscape requires resilience and adaptability, especially for organizations like PSMC striving to maintain their competitive edge globally. The dissolution of this partnership may serve as a cautionary tale while emphasizing the importance of transparency and commitment in multinational collaborations.

Moving forward, it remains to be seen how both PSMC and SBI Holdings will navigate the challenges posed by this setback. For SBI Holdings, which has expressed its intent to regroup and focus on future opportunities, reassuring stakeholders and rebuilding trust will be imperative. Meanwhile, PSMC must confront both the internal challenges exacerbated by this incident and the external pressures dominating the semiconductor market.

This development calls attention to the broader impacts of market dynamics and strategic decisions in the high-tech industry. As companies continue to adapt to rapidly changing technological landscapes, successful partnerships will hinge on clear communication, shared accountability, and decisive actions that align with market realities.

Back To Top